cnma

[Back to list of manuscript types]

Manuscript Type: Essays

Please only use the form below if you have been explicitly asked by the editorial office not to use Editorial Manager (for example, because a decision was already made) or if Editorial Manager is unavailable.

Reviewer Instructions

In Essays (up to 15000 characters) themes from every aspect of chemistry, including the philosophy or history of science, can be addressed freely. Use of unpublished results from original research should be extremely limited. Primarily, known topics should be discussed illuminatingly and critically from a new vantage point, and they should be suitably illustrated. Essays should usually have only one Author.

Referees should give an overall recommendation as to whether a manuscript should be published without, with minor, or with major alterations, or should be rejected.

Please formulate the comments for the Authors in a polite form, even when heavy criticism is being delivered.

Minor alterations include:

Major alterations include:

Manuscripts that require major alterations will usually be re-evaluated by the referee(s).

To help us assess the paper we request that you answer the following questions:

1. Please rate the current interest of the topic to chemists

The judgment of the importance of a paper is to a certain extent subjective. Please note, we are asking for an evaluation of the importance only with regard to publication in ChemNanoMat. Thus, a paper can be considered to be very important or important for a broad and heterogeneous readership and is thus suitable for publication in ChemNanoMat. A highly specialized paper might not be important for ChemNanoMat but only for a specific area of materials chemistry.

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript

Essays should have no more than 15000 characters.

4. Please rate the critical selection of presented content

5. Please rate the instructive presentation of the content

6. Please indicate whether you have included attachments

If you have information that is relevant to the comments and recommendation you have made, this can be sent either as an attachment for the Handling Editor or for the Author. Where the attachment is for the Author, please ensure that any formulations or file information will not give away your identity.

Review Form

Referee e-mail
Manuscript number

1. Please rate the current interest of the topic to chemists [help]

Question 1

  • Very important, of wide interest for both specialists and nonspecialists
  • Important for the wider field of materials chemistry
  • Too specialized, should be published elsewhere. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate in the Comments to Author text box.
  • Not important, should not be published

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications [help]

Question 2

  • Good balanced overview
  • Too selective, many relevant papers are not cited
  • Better selection required, many papers with low relevance are cited

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript [help]

Question 3

Essays should have no more than 15000 characters.

  • Concise and correct length
  • Too long; contains unnecessary information
  • Too short; requires additional information

4. Please rate the critical selection of presented content [help]

Question 4

  • Good balanced overview
  • Few additions required
  • Better selection required

5. Please rate the instructive presentation of the content [help]

Question 5

  • Good logical approach
  • Can be improved
  • Not well organized

Comments for the Authors

Attachments (for authors; 3 MB max. size):

Comments for the Editors

Attachments (editors only; 3 MB max. size):